Indian platform offering engineering upskilling courses and master's programs.
The course material on Skill-Lync is genuinely good and the projects are relevant to engineering jobs. That said, the price is steep compared to what's out there, and the support experience really depends on which mentor you get. I learned a lot, but I'm torn on whether it was worth the full fee.
Quality engineering projects
Expensive and inconsistent support
I enrolled in Skill-Lync mainly because of the placement support that was pitched during the counselling call. After finishing the course, the so-called placement assistance was just a few generic job links forwarded over email. For the fees I paid, I expected far more concrete career support.
Skill-Lync has a RevWala Trust Score of 58/100 (Average), based on 5 customer reviews with an average rating of 3.6 out of 5. Reviews are mixed — read recent ones before deciding.
Skill-Lync is rated 3.6 out of 5 stars from 5 reviews on RevWala, with a "Average" Trust Score.
Skill-Lync has 5 reviews on RevWala, including 3 verified reviews.
Placement support overhyped during sales call
I took the CFD master's program on Skill-Lync and the project-based assignments genuinely improved my simulation skills. The mentors were patient during doubt-clearing sessions and the industry projects look good on my resume. Only gripe is the dashboard was occasionally slow to load lecture videos.
Hands-on projects and responsive mentors
Video player can be laggy
Skill-Lync's HEV master's program was exactly what I needed to transition from manufacturing into the EV domain. The MATLAB and Simulink modules were taught with real powertrain examples, and every project pushed me to actually understand the theory. I landed an interview within two months of completing it and the certificate carried real weight.
Deep, industry-relevant EV curriculum
As a working professional I appreciated that Skill-Lync's sessions were recorded so I could revise after office hours. The Python-for-mechanical-engineers track was well structured and the assignments were challenging in a good way. My only complaint is that doubt responses sometimes took a day or two to come back.
Flexible recorded sessions, practical assignments
Slow turnaround on some doubts